Back

Who we insure

AI Software & Agents

For companies whose product is a model or an agent: software that answers the ticket, approves the transaction or runs the workflow on its own. We place coverage whose wording reaches a model's output, and read every exclusion before it binds.

What coverage you need, and why

An AI software company needs technology errors and omissions, usually called tech E&O, as the anchor, because it is the line built to respond when your technology's work causes a customer a financial loss, and a model's output is your technology's work. Cyber liability sits beside it for breaches, data exposure and the response costs that follow. General liability arrives early because leases and contracts require it, and directors and officers coverage arrives at the first priced round because term sheets require it.

The part that is specific to AI is the wording. A tech E&O form written before agents existed can carry a generative AI exclusion, an absolute AI exclusion, or a definition of technology services that never reaches a model's decision. Two quotes with the same premium and limits can behave completely differently at claim time.

Why a standard tech policy is not enough

When an agent mishandles a customer's workflow or a model's output causes a loss, the claim lands on the company that deployed it. The model provider's terms push that liability to you, and your customer's contract is with you.

Some insurers now attach AI exclusions to the technology and management policies they still quote. Some are limited to generative AI. Others are absolute, reaching claims arising out of any use, development or deployment of AI (Fenwick, 2026-06-15). The exclusion sits in the paper unnoticed until there is a claim, and then it decides whether the policy responds.

We place with insurers who write AI on purpose and read every policy before it binds. You get a plain-words account of what each one responds to and where an exclusion sits.

What enterprise procurement asks for

The first time insurance blocks a deal is usually a security and vendor review. Procurement wants certificates of tech E&O, cyber and general liability at stated limits, commonly $1M to $5M per claim for E&O and cyber and $1M per occurrence for general liability, before the master services agreement is signed. Regulated customers in finance and health ask for more, and a few ask to be named as additional insured on the general liability policy.

Investors ask for directors and officers coverage at the priced round, and the term sheet often sets a deadline. Landlords ask for a general liability certificate before the lease. Model providers ask for nothing, because their terms already push the liability to you.

A security questionnaire asks for the certificate on page one. If the program is placed before the review starts, you attach it. If it is not, the signature waits on an underwriter.

What it costs

We don't publish our own numbers, because premiums are specific to your operation and come back from the carriers themselves. One dated survey from a startup-focused insurer is worth knowing as an anchor, with the caveat that it covers startups of every kind and the AI-specific placement can sit above or below it.

Medians across more than 3,000 startups of every kind, published 2026-05-21 by a startup insurer. The source states that pricing varies by industry, location, claims history, stage and limits. These are not our figures and not a quote.

What to watch for in the wording

Start with the exclusions. A generative AI exclusion removes claims arising out of a system that creates content or responses; an absolute AI exclusion removes claims arising out of any use, deployment or development of AI, including statements about what your AI can do. The second kind, on a D&O or E&O form, can swallow an AI company's core business. The tracker lists what has been filed, by whom, with sources and dates.

Then read the definitions. The insuring agreement responds to a claim arising from your technology services or technology products, and both terms are defined. If neither definition reaches a model's output or an agent's action, the exclusion never has to be invoked; the claim simply falls outside the grant. Ask for language that names AI, machine learning and autonomous decision-making inside the definition.

Cyber forms need a second reading for prompt injection, model manipulation and data leakage through the model. A breach is still a breach, and most cyber forms respond to unauthorised access however it happened, but the definitions of computer system and security failure vary, and a few carriers now sell an affirmative AI endorsement to remove the doubt.

The lines that anchor the program

Click through the lines a company like yours usually carries, and what each one answers.

1 of 4

Professional Liability (Tech E&O)

Your product messes up and costs a customer money. This pays what you owe them, and the legal defense.

Comes up: Your first customer contract; enterprise procurement often requires it to sign.

What it covers

How to buy it

Tell us what the product does, where it runs, whose data it touches and what your customers' contracts ask for. The application turns that into a submission written for AI companies, and a licensed broker takes it to the insurers who cover AI on purpose.

Quotes come back with the forms. We read every exclusion and every definition, show you side by side what each policy responds to, and issue certificates to your customer's requirements once it binds. If a renewal arrives with a new AI exclusion, we tell you before it takes effect and go back to the market for a buy-back or a narrower version.

Common questions

If our agent makes a mistake in a customer workflow, whose insurance responds?

Yours. Model providers' terms push liability to whoever deployed the system, and your customer's contract is with you. Tech E&O is the line built to answer that claim, as long as the policy does not exclude AI.

Do standard tech policies cover AI products?

Some still do, and a growing number now carry an AI exclusion. Two quotes with the same premium and limits can behave completely differently at claim time. We read every policy before anything binds and place you with insurers who cover AI on purpose.

What will enterprise procurement ask us to carry?

The common asks are tech E&O, cyber and general liability certificates at stated limits. Having the program placed before the security review starts keeps insurance off the critical path of a signature.

What is the difference between a generative AI exclusion and an absolute AI exclusion?

A generative AI exclusion removes claims arising out of a system that creates content or responses. An absolute AI exclusion removes claims arising out of any use, deployment or development of AI, including what you say about it. The first narrows a policy; the second can empty it for an AI company.

Does cyber insurance respond to a prompt injection attack or a model leaking data?

Most cyber forms respond to unauthorised access and data exposure however they happened, subject to how the form defines a security failure. We read that definition, and where a carrier offers an affirmative AI endorsement we ask for it.

Our renewal came back with a new AI exclusion. What now?

Do not accept it by default. The options are a buy-back of the excluded exposure, a narrower version limited to generative content, or a different carrier that covers AI explicitly. We take the same submission to the market and show you the difference in wording beside the difference in premium.

Is the model provider ever liable for what their model does?

Their terms are written so that the answer is almost always no. The company that deployed the model holds the customer contract and the exposure, which is why the wording on your own policy matters more than theirs.

Sources

  1. 1. Fenwick, "The End of 'Silent AI'? Emerging AI Exclusions, Coverage Fragmentation and Practical Implications", 2026-06-15.
  2. 2. Startup insurance costs in 2026, a startup insurer's pricing survey of more than 3,000 startups, 2026-05-21.

This page describes coverage in general terms. It is not an offer of insurance, and carrier appetite, policy wording, licensing, and availability govern every quote and every claim. Last revised 2026-09-12.